i think what you think: it was more suitable back then than it is now... and of course, many many things were "suitable" back then -- ahem --
now, whenever i hear of a fellow female who's husband comes back one day from another wedding (and he's the groom

) i applaud her when she kicks him out of the house, takes her kids and his and her money and leaves. Any woman who agrees to "share" her husband with another one should be stripped of that title.
People might argue... oh, okay - yeah, i can't make babies and there's no one to carry my poor husband's name/money... if they got married just to reproduce and have offspring to carry their genes/money/property/status/name then their marriage was bound to get messed up sooner or later....
What pisses me off the most is when they think it's the girl who's not fertile, they give her hell and pressure her husband to ditch her and get another fertile woman. But then when they find out that it's the GUY who's infertile, then they keep it quiet and keep the marriage together and buy the couple gifts and take them on vacations so they can "forget"....


